| 
 
 To 
      the Editor of the Straits Times Dear 
      Sir, For the past 35 years I 
      have studied the protein-and vitamin- rich aquatic microorganism called 
      Spirulina (the Cyanoprokaryote Arthrospira platensis).  I've grown it in the laboratory, 
      designed and installed self-sufficient farms or culturing systems in 
      remote Third World villages for the purpose of fighting against 
      malnutrition, written books about it, and taught hundreds of students 
      about its history, physiology, chemical composition, requirements for its 
      growth, how to use it, and the health benefits it can be expected to 
      give. Also, for the past 35 
      years I have consumed from 10 to 20 grams (dry weight) of Spirulina a day, 
      with a 90-day period during which I consumed 45 grams per day. I am over 
      83 years old and in good health. My attention has been 
      drawn recently to an article written by Mr. Andy Ho in the 
       It is more than just 
      "unfortunate" that the Straits Times has seen it fit to publish such a 
      sensational condemnation of Spirulina based upon such shallow 
      research.  The reputation of 
      your journal deserves more correctness and the reputation of Spirulina 
      demands the truth because it is saving the lives of thousands of children 
      throughout the world and needs to continue doing so.  No journal has the right to deny 
      these children the good health they receive from 
      Spirulina. Along with everyone 
      else, we sympathize with the actress, Andrea De Cruz, who, suffering from 
      liver failure, was obliged to undergo a liver transplant operation.  Your article claims the British 
      liver specialist, Dr. Julia Wendon, said Ms. De 
      Cruz's condition may have been brought on by a health food supplement, 
      called Spirulina. Correction: the supplement was called Slim 10, which 
      contains nitroso- fenfluramine: This, according to the 
       There are many 
      blue-green algae (actually they are not algae, but Cyanoprokaryotes, which 
      originated more than a billion years before the algae) and a number of 
      them have been known to produce toxins under certain circumstances - 
      especially to protect themselves against predation by zooplankton. Medical 
      doctors have a bewildering number of things to learn before getting their 
      diplomas.  So it is not surprising if one of them does not know which 
      Cyanoprokaryotes are not toxic and why. Spirulina is not 
      considered to be a toxin producer, whereas Anabaena, Microcystis, 
      Aphanizomenon flos aquae, Nodularia, Planktothrix and others can be toxic. This is 
      disturbing because Aphanizomenon flos aquae from 
       Mr. Ho, perhaps quoting 
      from the publicity of some ill-advised "algae" grower, writes that blue-green algae is "so low on the food chain it has to 
      be packed with nutrients and energy …. that it is 
      so rich in protein, vitamins, minerals and other beneficial nutrients it 
      is nature's perfect food, capable of sustaining life without the need for 
      other foods". Correction: Spirulina is not a source of energy, and one 
      cannot live without fats, cereals or other sources of energy.  Spirulina supplies the rest but 
      the Kanembou people of  Mr. Ho says Spirulina 
      contains vitamin B12 "otherwise found only in animal meat" and 
      that "humans can't absorb the vitamin B12 in Spirulina". 
      Correction: Besides meat, it is found in anaerobic bacteria, in fishes, in 
      milk and dairy products, special brewer's yeast and wheat germ (in that 
      descending order). There are several possible structural modifications of 
      the vitamin B12 molecule involving group substitutions, and 
      these modifications are called analogs. These analogs are not considered 
      to be effective against pernicious anemia which is corrected by vitamin 
      B12.  Spirulina 
      contains these analogs and that is why some people say humans cannot 
      absorb the vitamin B12 in Spirulina.  However, Spirulina also contains 
      0.4 mg of true Cyanocobalamine (vitamin 
      B12) per kilogram of dried biomass, not including the analogs - 
      which extrapolates to 4µg per 10-gram serving (twice the amount needed by 
      children and sufficient for pregnant women).  So it is false to say that humans 
      cannot absorb the vitamin B12 in 
      Spirulina. Mr. Ho says "The Aztecs 
      ate Spirulina as a food called tecuitlatl, if records kept by the Spanish 
      conquistadors are to be believed".  
      To insinuate that the Spanish were unable to report things 
      correctly around 500 years ago while he expects his readers to have faith 
      in what he writes today certainly doesn't advance his argument very 
      far. Mr. Ho speaks lightly of 
      the many hundreds of scientific articles concerning Spirulina published 
      within the past 30 years; the books and theses written about Spirulina, 
      and the splendid results obtained with kwashiorkor children when he says 
      "very preliminary evidence from very small studies suggest that Spirulina 
      .. may help.. but the 
      findings have yet to be confirmed by larger and longer studies". Not only 
      has it been studied extensively, but Spirulina has been eaten by man for 
      over a thousand years.  Is 
      anyone suggesting that larger and longer studies be conducted on tomatoes 
      before they can be recommended ?  They were introduced less than 500 
      years ago !  
      And, please, somebody, tell Mr. Ho that Chlorella is not one of the 
      "blue-green algae", but a green alga - a mistake of about a billion 
      years. Mr. Ho does say that 
      cultured Spirulina can be grown free of microcystins, but throughout the 
      article there is confusion between Spirulina and toxin-producing "algae", 
      and the reader is led to believe, from the title down to the last 
      sentence, that it is dangerous to eat Spirulina. Spirulina grows in 
      waters of considerably higher salinity and pH than the possibly-toxic 
      Aphanizomenon flos aquae, Anabaena, Microcystis and others, so the 
      likelihood of a Spirulina culture being contaminated with microcystins is 
      certainly minimum.  And, I'm sure, Mr. Ho will be glad 
      to know that there are rapid, sensitive, and reliable tests available for 
      microcystins. There is the Artemia nauplii bioassay test which is 
      extremely low in cost and reveals the presence of toxin within an hour. 
      Other aquatic organisms capable of being used in bioassays tests for 
      microcystins include: the Water Flea, Daphnia, the Copepod, Cyclops, the 
      Rotifer, Brachionus, the Protozoan, Paramecium, 
      and others easily maintained in culture in the field laboratory of a 
      Spirulina farm. And there is the EnviroLogix 
      Quicktube Microcystin 
      Kit, an ELISA test which detects quantities of microcystins as low as 0.3 
      of one part per billion (0.3 ppb).  
      It would take 1 microgram of microcystin 
      (injected intraperitoneally) to kill a 20-gram 
      mouse. By extrapolation, to kill a man would take 4000 times 
      more. As I have said, there 
      are many peer-reviewed scientific articles describing Spirulina, its 
      contents and effects. One should not miss The Potential Applications of 
      Spirulina as a Nutritional and Therapeutic Supplement in Health 
      Management, written by Dr. Amha Belay  and 
      published in the Journal of the American Nutriceutical Association, vol.5, N°2, Spring 
      2002.  This 21-page article is 
      a critical examination of more than 70 studies made in vitro, in vivo, 
      with rodents, fish, chickens, and human patients showing the immunomodulation effects of Spirulina, antioxidant 
      effects, anticancer and antiviral effects, cholesterol reduction activity, 
      and protection against radiation damage. In his concluding 
      remarks Dr. Belay states: "(1) the technology for mass cultivation and 
      harvest of Spirulina is well-established, (2) Spirulina has undergone two 
      decades of toxicity testing in addition to its known centuries of human 
      use, (3) microbiological and other safety standards have been established 
      for Spirulina products, (4) the two most commonly grown species, Spirulina 
      (Arthrospira) platensis and Spirulina (Arthrospira) maxima are free from 
      Cyanobacterial toxins and can be grown (under controlled conditions) free 
      of contaminant Cyanobacteria by virtue of their adaptation to a high 
      alkaline environment.." In September 1999, 
      Health   Spirulina is not a danger to human 
      health, but a natural food that restores health to humans who have been 
      exposed to dangers caused by other foods, to lack of food, or to 
      substandard living conditions. However, Mr. Ho's article is a wake-up call to Spirulina growers to 
      be alert to the presence in their cultures of other algae which could be 
      microcystin producers…. though it is known that 
      by keeping the total salinity and the pH at optimum levels there are no 
      such contaminants. Nevertheless, if there are any growers who do not test 
      for microcystins, they should do so, thus meeting their responsibility for 
      product safety. Spirulina is being fed 
      to child victims of malnutrition in 
       The Straits Times has an 
      obligation to present the truth about Spirulina to its readers. Business 
      interests, professional jealousy, shallow 
      research aside - the true story of Spirulina is fascinating, remarkable, 
      and promising for humanity. I am yours 
      sincerely, 
                                                                                                     
       Dr. 
      Ripley D. Fox Director 
      General Intergovernmental 
      Spirulina Program |